Read the excerpt from walden.
let us spend one day as deliberately as nature, and not be thrown off the track by every nutshell and mosquito’s wing that falls on the rails. let us rise early and fast, or break fast, gently and without perturbation; let company come and let company go, let the bells ring and the children cry—determined to make a day of it.
how does thoreau use the imagery of bells in the excerpt?
a - the bells represent festivity.
b - the bells symbolize a spirit of happiness.
c - the bells are a symbol of civilization.
d - the bells represent fate.
The correct answer is option D.
The excerpt from Walden what the author is trying to say is that people should stop worrying about everything and start enjoying the things around them more.
When he says let the bells ring and the children cry, he is saying that you have to let things happen, no matter what those things are.
Explanation: the crate takes him from the wild and into civilization
The reference highlights President Eisenhower’s deep dislike of the governor and shows his willingness to remove him from office.
Indeed, it reaffirms the reasons for the President's removal of Governor Faubus from office.
Remember, back in the 1950s during the racial discrimination crises, the Supreme Court made a unanimous decision to allow black students to attend the same school with the whites.
However, Governor Faubus went against the court ruling by directing that black students be prevented from coming to the Little Rock Central High School. An action that made Eisenhower dislike him.
Robinson uses Governor Faubus as a metaphor for racial segregation and therefore provides a strong visual image.
President Eisenhower was an army general in the United States later became the 34th president of America. Jackie Robinson’s letter to President Eisenhower stated that Robinson used Governor Faubus as a metaphor for racial segregation and therefore provides a strong visual image. Governor Faubus was known for stopping African Americans from attending central high school as part of federally ordered racial discrimination.
B)restrict the freedom of assembly.
Edwards v. South Carolina is significant because it limited states' ability to restrict the freedom of assembly. In 1961, about 180 petitioners got together at the Zion Baptist Church in Columbia to march in small groups. They wanted to express their grievances about African-Americans' civil rights. Despite not showing any signs of violence the police threaten to arrest the petitioners if they didn't disperse. However, they refused to disperse and were convicted of the common law crime of breach of the peace. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court said that petitioners' freedom of speech, assembly and petition had been violated. These rights are granted by the first amendment.
Edwards v. South Carolina is significant because it limited states’ ability to :
restrict the freedom of speech.
In March, 1961, a number of African-American high school and college students gathered at Zion Baptist Church in Columbia, South Carolina. From there they marched in groups to the South Carolina State House in a peaceful protest march concerning civil rights of black American citizens. They maintained a peaceful, non-violent approach throughout their activity. Nevertheless, police officials insisted that they had to stop their assembly and disperse within 15 minutes, or be arrested. They did not disperse; they sang spiritual and patriotic songs. 187 persons were arrested and charged with disturbing the peace.
The students who were arrested and punished sought justice through the court system, and their case, known as Edwards v. South Carolina, was decided by the US Supreme Court in 1963. The Court held that the Constitution (specifically the 1st and 14th Amendments) did not allow state government officials or police to force a crowd to disperse when they are otherwise behaving legally. Marching in front of a state house in a peaceful manner is a protected form of free speech. Edwards v. South Carolina protected the right of citizens to assemble and express their views in a peaceful protest.
Edwards v. South Carolina is significant because it limited states’ ability to restrict the freedom of speech.
Edwards versus South Carolina ruling was delivered by the “Supreme Court” of the US in 1963. The Court held 1st and 14th Amendments of the Constitution didn't grant state government representatives to force a horde to disband despite they are doing something illegal. Trooping opposite to the statehouse in a non-violent way is protected under free speech. Edwards versus South Carolina sheltered the right of citizens to gather and express their visions in a non-violent manner.
In March 1961, numerous African-American students of high school and college gathered in front of “Zion Baptist Church” of Columbia, South Carolina. Later they marched to the “South Carolina State House” in a peaceful manner advocating for the civil rights of black citizens. They maintained a peaceful, non-violent protest until the police officials ordered them to halt their protest and disperse within 15 minutes. They refused to disperse and started singing patriotic songs. Around 187 protesters were arrested and were charged for disrupting the peace.
Learn More :Why did President Reagan call for soviet leader Gorbachev to “tear down” the berlin wall? Which of these was one of the few successes of the United States government under the articles of confederation? In a parliamentary system of representative democracy, the prime minister is appointed by the monarch. Is elected by representatives chosen by the people. Is the leader of the party that won the most seats in parliament? Is elected directly by the people?
Grade: High School
Chapter: Edwards versus South Carolina
Keywords: Edwards versus South Carolina, Supreme Court, illegal, non-violent, manner, Zion Baptist Church, Columbia, South Carolina, South Carolina State House, peace.
restrict the freedom of speech.
atmospheres is the answer to your question.
answer: #1 is (a) however
let us spend one day as deliberately as nature, and not be...